Agama DR ASRI-KALIMAH ALLAH_Antara Merebut Nama Allah Dan Mempertahankan Akidah mediaterjah 8 years ago Prev Article Next Article MediaTerjah Facebook Prev Article Next Article Related Posts DR ASRI-KELUAR BALCKOUR 505 MATI SYAHID ??? mediaterjah 02/07/2013 DR ASRI-MASA Itu Makhluk_Sebelum & Selepas Hanya Ada Pd Makhluk_Bila Lailatu Qadr? mediaterjah 20/07/2014 16-03-2014 Dr. Danial Zainal Abidin, Tafsir Surah Al Fatihah Ayat 5-7 mediaterjah 18/03/2014 DR ASRI-Berperang Dgn Hawa Nafsu Adakah JIHAD? mediaterjah 11/09/2014 Sunnah Nabi SAW guna siwak atau jaga kebersihan-Dr Ahmad Jailani mediaterjah 18/11/2014 DR ASRI-EDISI Blm Solat Sudah Keliru_Maksud IMAM ITU UTK DIIKUTI mediaterjah 11/08/2014 18-10-2012 dr. asri zainul abidin, tauhid anti syirik. mediaterjah 19/10/2012 DR ASRI-HASAD YG TAK SUDAH Buatlah Dan Tunggulah Kesannya Dari Pencatur Alam Ini mediaterjah 10/09/2014 Tun Mahathir – Singapura dibawa masuk dan kesannya kepada orang orang Melayu mediaterjah 17/01/2013 10 Comments Ahmad Mazlan Kamil dah tahu Allah itu Maha Suci , Maha Esa, .ada 99 nama2 Allah..pasal apa nak bagi guna dalam bible yg kotor dan tidak mengesakan Allah…orang kafir nak guna nama Allah boleh tapi setiap ucapan kalimah Allah walaupun dari mulut orang kafir kena merujuk pada tuhan yang Esa..yang diterangkan dengan sempurna di dalam Al quran shj… ontah mano Mana boleh guna…. apela bodo sgt korang ni….. haduuiiiyaii mike pritchard (11) If the words of the original Bible cannot be known, then how can anyone, let alone a Muslim, claim that the Quran is superior? Aren’t you are making an imaginary comparison if you cannot show anyone the original Bible? (12) If God can simply negate his word, then why should anyone believe he won’t do so with the Quran? What is the evidence that he won’t negate his statements and what he implies in the Quran if he merely throws away what he says before with no evident reason why? (13) Not only are you unable to compare the original Bible with the Quran, but you can’t even show that there was another word of God, which again, is because you claim that no one can know what it is. (14) How is the Qu’an better if the Bible has more historical evidence, and less debatable evidence? (15) Why if the Jews didn’t want anyone to know that they corrupted the Bible, but instead wanted the world to believe that they were trustworthy, would they often mention that most of them were evil in nearly everything they wrote about themselves? (16) Why would the Jews let everyone know that the Bible could be corrupted or lost if they wanted to deceive everyone into thinking it was true? Are only bad things that God says about the Jews true? Doesn’t even the Quran say good things about Jews and even Christians, and that they will go to Heaven? (17) Why do anti-Bible Muslims say certain verses in the Bible are evidence that the Bible is corrupt because it says it can be or was totally corrupted? It’s a contradiction to say, “These verses are God’s true word” but to also say, “The Bible was lost“. (18) Why are there countless archeological evidences for the Bible and almost none in comparison for the Quran? Further, the Quran’s evidence is heavily disputed. Shouldn’t the opposite be true if the Qur’an is a superior version of his word? Here are examples of evidence for the Bible discussed on various websites (and in one pay-to-read document): (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29). Here is a list of 100 alleged contradictions in the Bible and here are even more contradictions and arguments against the Bible, all shown false, which shows the hopelessness of arguing against it. I personally have refuted over 400 arguments against the Bible, and many variations of them, some of which I thought of myself, but I haven’t finished the book yet and it isn’t available. Here are examples of alleged evidence for the Quran: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7). I’ve included the supposed Muslims evidence along with arguments against them, because anyone can show a list of evidence with no challenges (and my journal contains or links to hundreds challenges against the Bible, all of which turned out to be illogical arguments). (19) Which verse in the Quran replaced and is better that this one?: “Don’t lie.” (20) Which passage in the Quran replaced and is better than this one? Answer ALL the questions above BEFORE you open your mouths ever again declaring that my Holy Bible is corrupted and for such a diabolical claim: I ask you thus: ‘FROM WHICH PART OF HELL WAS SUCH A SATANIC LIE CONCOCTED AND SHOW ME THE ORIGINAL BIBLE THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT APART FROM HERETICAL WRITINGS OF ANTI-CHRISTS OF THE PAST LIKE THE BOOK OF BARNABAS..’?? I am just one of the FEW genuine Christians in Malaysia who support your religious clarion call that “ALLAH IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR MUSLIMS”, but it hurts me so much when Muslims start telling LIES that my Holy Bible is corrupted WITHOUT any shred of an evidence. It that’s how you feel about my Holy Bible, then I too can tell you that the Koran is a LIE or a HOAX. Most of which has been a plagiarisation of the Christian Bible but with so much editing by the Muslim caliphs! Agape Love. mike pritchard 20(+1) QUESTIONS TO MUSLIMS (Part#1 of 2) : (1) If the Bible cannot be trusted because it was corrupted by Jews (or that certain books which were God’s word were magically vanished by the Catholic Church as many ignorant pagans claim), then why do Muslims also claim that it was because God did away with the Bible to replace it with something better? Which is it?: The Jews defeated God or God negated his word? (2) How could a few mere Jews defeat God by corrupting his word so that no one would know what God truly said? Wasn’t God powerful and intelligent enough to tell everyone what the Jews lied about or to hide a copy somewhere to be found later, as he did with the Dead Sea Scrolls? (3) According to one Muslim, the Jews didn’t defeat God, but God allowed himself his word to be corrupted, but if that is true, then why would God allow his word to be corrupted? (4) Why was God’s first word not important enough to protect? Was it because man’s word, man’s lies, were more important? And note that though God allows man to ruin things which he made and things which man makes so that he can serve God, (5) If God’s word is perfect and nothing which is perfect thing can’t be made better/improved, why then do Muslims say that God’s “second book” (the Qur’an) is better then his first (the Bible)? (6) How does saying, “God didn’t protect his word” change the fact that God’s first word was defeated, that the Jews had victory over God’s first word? Victory means: “A successful ending of a struggle or contest.” If someone turns my word into a lie, how did they not achieve victory over my word even if I let them turn it into a lie? (7) If the answer is, “God wanted the world to believe in lies” then why not simply allow some copies of his word to be corrupt and some to be correct? Why replace what he said with another book? (8) If it is not blasphemy to say that God allowed his first word to be defeated by very small amount of Jews, then why is it blasphemy to say that God represented himself with a messenger which he allowed the patriarch of Israel, Jacob, to defeat in a game of wrestling between a Father and his son (loved creation)? (9) Why didn’t God simply say “what was best” with his first book? In other words: Why did he make an inferior one? Wouldn’t that be a reasonless waste of time? (10) Why did God only allow a few people to know his first word? Wasn’t it worth showing to the whole world, to billions of people, and nos just a few, like Moses, Joshua, Aaron, Isaac, Jacob, Esau, Ishmael, Jesus and Mohammed? (see part #2 of 2) manziro11 Ustaz tak faham konteks dan waqi’ …. pemerintah larang sebab ada maslahah utk umat Islam Malaysia.. Kalau bible versi Bahasa Malaysia si gunakanlah kalimah Tuhan blankco sykes isu pgunaan kalimah allah dlm bible masih tk terjawab SADDAM BIN DANRANG BIN BACO bismillahirrahmanirrahim….. stakat ni, saya bru dgar bbrapa pndangan mngenai isu ini. dan trdapat dua orang yang pndangannya serupa dan sya brsetuju… blackdragon8482 wahai asri bodo..memang la islam tak larang meraka guna khalimah Allah. tapi tahu tak..dalam meraka anggap Allah ada 3..Allah dalam bentuk manusia. macam2 lagi aku tengok. apesal bangang sangat ko ni asri. blackdragon8482 knapa la kalut sgt dgn isu ni..knapa xboleh nk buat spt biasa? knapa perlu timbulkan isu nk guna kalimah Allah ni…..pope sndiri xguna kalimah Allah, apapasal si asri ni sibuk nk bg depa guna?? bodoh. asri bodo kepala hotak kau bangang blackdragon8482 dr asri ni dok bela org kapir nk guna nama Allah. lepastu dok banding2 ng zaman nabi..zaman nabi dan sahabt, klu ada org pijak or bakar nama Allah or permain2kan al quran, nescaya depa pg pancung mereka2 ini..keadaan hari ini, klu depa permain2kan nama Allah, sape yg dpt buat spt sahabat buat dlu? kita xdpt buat apa2 klu org kapir main2kannya..sedar la sikit.